1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

LA Times Editorial Says HSUS Doesn't Support Local Shelters

Discussion in 'Dog Blogs' started by HumaneWatch, Jun 12, 2011.

  1. HumaneWatch

    HumaneWatch Humane Watch RSS Feed

    LA Times Editorial Says HSUS Doesn’t Support Local Shelters

    If you’re coming to HumaneWatch for the first time today because you saw an editorial that criticized us in today’s Los Angeles Times, welcome! It seems our hard-hitting ads have struck a nerve. Tinseltown is fast becoming the Humane Society of the United States’s power center, so we’re not surprised to learn that its leaders apparently persuaded the Times to take a closer look at our campaign to keep them honest.

    The L.A Times Editorial Board told its readers two important facts about the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Commenting on our recent ads in the paper, they wrote:

    One of the current ads features a photo of dogs looking wide-eyed in shock under the caption "SURPRISED to hear the Humane Society of the United States shares only 1 percent of your donations with local pet shelters?" The ad goes on to state that the Humane Society "is NOT your local animal shelter.

    The ad is true on both counts.

    Too few Americans are aware of HSUS's misplaced priorities and the LA Times' reitteration of our central message is an important step in educating more Americans about HSUS's deception. But, alas, the L.A. Times couldn't stop there. The editors went on to write:

    But [the ad is] also misleading. The Humane Society has never claimed that its mission is to fund local animal shelters... While some people may mistakenly believe that the Humane Society of the United States does the same job local humane societies do, it should not surprise anyone who has looked at the organization's website that only a small percentage of its money goes to local shelters.

    Here we disagree—strongly. There is an important distinction between claims and perception. Although HSUS never explicitly claims to support local hands-on shelters, it does go out of its way to perpetuate the perception that the group's primary focus is helping homeless dogs and cats. A recent national poll found that 71 percent of Americans believe that HSUS is an umbrella organization for the nation's hands-on pet shelters.

    It is frustrating that the L.A. Times papered over HSUS's intentional public misrepresentation of its mission. Whether you love us or hate us, we encourage you to make up your own mind about the HSUS.

    Just take the L.A. Times' own challenge and visit HSUS's homepage. Three of the four primary images are about dogs and cats. Better yet, take a look at HSUS's fundraising page. It's wall-to-wall dogs and cats. Now try to find HSUS's disclaimer explaining that they do not fund local shelters? Good luck.

    For the record, though, here’s what the Times didn’t tell you.

    1. Despite HSUS’s protests that it doesn’t claim to be a pet-shelter umbrella group, national polling conducted by Opinion Research Corporation has demonstrated that a huge majority of Americans wrongly believe it’s just that—a funding mechanism for local pet shelter support.
    2. The Times suggests that we are “dragging shelter pets into the fight” over HSUS’s duplicity. But it’s HSUS that has been throwing shelters (and their furry charges) under the bus for years, mainly by poaching unsuspecting donors from their communities. The State Humane Association of California has already publicly complained about similar misbehavior by the ASPCA, so this problem is certainly on shelters’ collective radar screens.
    3. The Times observed that a public affairs firm with which HumaneWatch’s parent organization contracts for services runs another organization that questions some policies of MADD. Today’s editorial blurs an important distinction in the way an unscrupulous commentator might hold one attorney responsible for the way another lawyer in the same firm defends his clients. That organization and this one are separate, although the management firm in question provides services to both.
    The L.A. Times concludes:

    If [HumaneWatch.org] don't like the Humane Society's positions, they are entitled, of course, to make their case. But don't drag shelter pets into the fight.

    It is the Humane Society of the United States—not us—who is guilty of dragging dogs and cats into this debate. We've tirelessly engaged the HSUS toe-to-toe on numerous issues affecting animals. And we're happy to debate them on the merits of their proposals, but we refuse to allow them to cloud the debate by bringing the moral authority of representing the nation's struggling animal shelters when it is not true.



    More from HumaneWatch...
     

Share This Page