1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

League City, Texas officials talk about breed discriminatory law

Discussion in 'Laws & Legislation' started by StopBSL.com, Apr 24, 2014.

  1. StopBSL.com

    StopBSL.com StopBSL.com RSS Feed

    City officials in League City, Texas, have begun to talk about instituting a breed discriminatory law.

    Following an attack by a dog identified as a pit bull, city officials are looking at restrictions for “pit bulls.”

    A toddler and mother were watching the mother*s boyfriends dog when the dog attacked. *There have been no details as to the moments leading up to the attack or how well know the dog was to the victims.

    Councilman Todd Kinsey has said that he would like to see breed based restrictions enacted in the city. *He claims that local statistics point to the need for a breed based law. *These numbers have not as yet been supplied to the public, nor have any details regarding any circumstances of these incidents such as free roaming or chained dogs, percentage of incidents that were dog on dog, dog on human, sexual status of the attacking dog, how the “breed” of the dog is being identified and other such pertinent information.

    Kinsey claimed that 80% of attacks “resulting in injury” are by dogs identified as pit bulls. *This claim leaves out the actual number of attacks in League City, total number of attacks attributed to “pit bulls” as well as population of dogs being identified as pit bulls in the community. *Without this information, the claim of 80% is specious at best.

    At a city council meeting the Police Chief outlined several measures for the control of “dangerous dogs.” *The following were options discussed:*mandatory microchips, fluorescent ID tags and sterilization of dogs meeting a definition of dangerous. *Chief Kramm also included the idea that a dog deemed dangerous be euthanized or banned from the city limits.

    Officials are aware that there is a law in Texas that prohibits the enactment of a breed discriminatory law. *However, they seem to be under the impression that such a law applies only to a breed ban, and not restrictions.

    From a recent article: *“According to Police Chief Kramm, Texas law prohibits the banning of specific breeds but it would be possible to increase regulations for pit bulls.Kinsey said he would like to see higher registration fees for pit bulls, extra security fences so they are unable to dig out of yards as well as special liability insurance requirements.”I*m in favor of making it difficult for people who want to own pit bulls in our community,” Kinsey said.”

    Texas state law prohibits any form of breed discriminatory law, including restrictions.”

    HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
    TITLE 10. HEALTH AND SAFETY OF ANIMALS
    CHAPTER 822. REGULATION OF ANIMALS
    SUBCHAPTER D. DANGEROUS DOGS
    § 822.047. LOCAL REGULATION OF DANGEROUS DOGS.


    A county or municipality may place additional requirements or restrictions on dangerous dogs if the requirements or restrictions:

    (1) are not specific to one breed or several breeds of dogs; and
    (2) are more stringent than restrictions provided by this subchapter.


    It is clear in the statute that this applies not only to bans but also to restrictions.

    Nothing official has been proposed at this time, but residents and locals should attend council meetings to urge for reckless owner ordinances, and the strengthening of the current dangerous dog law that would create more nuanced categories and more stringent penalties for those who do not operate proper care and control of their dogs.


    Filed under: Whispers of BSL [​IMG] [​IMG][​IMG]

    More from StopBSL.com...
     
  2. treezpitz

    treezpitz CH Dog Staff Member

    "but residents and locals should attend council meetings to urge for reckless owner ordinances"


    Now that makes alot more sense to me, instead of punishing the breed, punish the ones who don't properly contain/watch over them. It probably makes too much sense for them to actually consider making that a ordinance though. They'd rather spend time enacting "tethering" ordinances. LOL What a joke.
     
  3. postmandan

    postmandan Big Dog

    they can actually pass these "breed specific laws"but if they enfire the laws they are open to all kinds of lawsuits and could be arrested. this has happened before befre here in texas-- dan
     
  4. 305APBT

    305APBT Big Dog

    Having grown up in an BSL city I know that there is money to be made for dogs that are either put down, or bailed out of doggy jail. That one salty neighbor that doesn't like dogs barking drops a dime and might even get some reward money or a pat on the back after calling AC.
     
  5. 305APBT

    305APBT Big Dog

    Treez I really don't understand the tethering laws also. Some dogs, APBT or not need to be confined and it's the most logical way to do so.

    "sterilization of dogs meeting a definition of dangerous."
     
  6. david63

    david63 CH Dog

    Look if your dogs are on a chain or in a fenced in yard it should be okay. But there again the city makes their own rules up as they go along.
     
  7. david63

    david63 CH Dog

    I Do not understand how they deem your dog dangerous or not if its in your yard fenced in or on a chain.
     
  8. Beatrix Kiddo

    Beatrix Kiddo Top Dog

    I live on the other side of town from League City, but I really hope they aren't able to put anything in place. It will just spread and soon the entire city of Houston is facing the same restrictions. I just want to keep people especially the fuzz out of my business. I'm as responsible as I humanly can be and do everything I can to prevent any potential accidents or altercations so hopefully it wouldn't affect me if it does pass.
     
  9. treezpitz

    treezpitz CH Dog Staff Member

    People have to stand up and speak to their public officials before it passes ANYWHERE. If it's your neighboring city, it's only a matter of time before it is you. If you just sit back and "hope", it's not doing any good. Be proactive instead of reactive.
     
  10. david63

    david63 CH Dog

    Good advice treezpitz.
     

Share This Page