breeding

I think if you do not game .... you shouldnt be breeding gamedogs. what do yall think

 

1. I think that then no one in the US should Legally be breeding their APBT, because they can't legally "....." their dog.
and
2. I think that this question is a double load question just looking to get some people in some trouble.

 

The gamedog standard should be met before breeding two dogs.

The language used in this topic will determine if this thread stay's open. Have a good clean debate!

 

good answer (#1)
and yeah, we'll see how this one runs its course....

 

Take that to another forum

 

Everyone thinks...

And I think this thread needs no more replies

 

All that thinking will get you into trouble. You shouldn't do so much of it.

 

I think if you don't post better questions you shouldn't post at all.

 

ok what about this I think gamedog standard should be met before breeding two dogs. if not you shouldnt be breeding gamedogs. lol

 

6 in one hand.. half dozen in the other. Same as your last question.

 

........LOL

 

nice try officer. close this thread, its a problem waiting to happen.

 

officer lol

 

damn, why is everyone so ready to close a thread so soon when nothing bad was even posted. Someone cant post theyre thoughts without incriminating guilt around here or what? Its not illegal to say you agree with something as long as you dont claim to do it. For instance you may not believe in the speed limit and you can legally say you believe you should be able to go faster and shouldnt drive unless you can go 90 mph but that dont mean you do it. Just that you believe you should if your going to even drive at all. Thats the beauty of the USA court system, and being able to speak your thoughts without incriminating yourself, by saying that nobody can prosecute you for speeding witout proof. So if you believe that about APBTs then whats wrong or illegal with saying it as long as you dont claim to do it? Nothing! I believe it also, but dont claim to do it, so whats the big deal about it if nothing bad was said regarding actually doing it, nothing to warrant closing the thread since no laws are broken by agreeing...nobody has claimed to do it or shown anyone a reason to believe they do so quit being paranoid around here and have fun, ....Nothin wrong said IMO....YET.

 

historically speaking yes they should..in this day and age most breeding is done in faith of records kept from the past..acts like a duck,quacks like a duck,its a duck...how good that duck swims or flys..you may know..you might not know.

 

i agree..........

 

It is important for ppl to challange and think about what they are breeding for. The lack of considerations is part of what plagues this breed the APBT.

Stepping a little off topic,however it is relevent.... Up unitl a couple of years ago. I was hell bent in disputing the number of the pitbull type dogs in shelters as a fact. Now I can no longer dispute these numbers. Unfortunatly most of these animals are the product of poor breeding practices and iresponsible placement.

IMO , it is integral for this type of topic to be discussed as it helps remind and renforce the Idea of good breeding pratices and ethics .....

CULL CULL CULL

 

u laugh at that but then there was this..............


http://www.game-dog.com/forums/showthread.php?p=245929#post245929

of course you went and edited your question after people got onto you. why is it you only post ... ....... questions? then you would wonder why somebody thinks you are a law enforcement.

this is a topic that has no place for discussion here. ....... is illegal today......plain and simple.

 

lol 1st i think Im to young to be a cop im only 19.
2nd Im just getting into game dogs and I just stated my opinion.

 

Language and how it is used is everything. Now I do apprieciate your efforts....cause you are on it like a dog on a bone LOL . But damn, I just had to editt you!

If ya'll feel that this is not appropriate, dont respond. I have No problem closing and editting threads.

Remember it is all about the language you use.