1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Advanced payment for care of pit bulls sought (Ed Faron, Wildside Kennels)

Discussion in 'Dog Discussion' started by mastiffsj, Dec 17, 2008.

  1. mastiffsj

    mastiffsj Big Dog

    http://www.journalpatriot.com/fullstory.asp?id=962

    Advanced payment for care of pit bulls sought
    by Jule Hubbard

    Papers filed in Wilkes District Court today seek money in advance for costs of housing and caring for 127 pit bulls seized last week as evidence in the investigation of a case involving dog fighting.

    The "petition for bond," filed by Wilkes County Attorney Tony Triplett, asked Chief Wilkes District Court Judge Mitchell McLean to enter an order requiring the payment from Edward A. Faron of Mertie Road in the Millers Creek area.

    Faron, 61, was arrested Dec. 10 on one count of felony dog fighting and baiting, the same day the 127 pit bulls were seized from his Wildside Kennels, which is on Faron’s property adjacent to his home.

    Triplett said the petition was filed on behalf of the Wilkes Animal Control Department. Included with the petition is an itemized list of expected costs showing $12,561 as the expected cost of housing, feeding and providing veterinary care for the 127 pit bulls for the first 30 days.

    Triplett said that under state statutes, a judge can allow the filing of a new affidavit every 30 days assessing the costs of boarding the animal to a defendant. He requested that McLean hold a hearing on the petition on Jan. 8, which is when Faron could contest the request.

    Under statutes, said Triplett, Faron could be required to pay the boarding costs even if he won the case.

    Wilkes Animal Control Director Junior Simmons said the dogs were being kept as evidence at an undisclosed location until completion of court proceedings in the case. Simmons and other officials wouldn’t say where the dogs were taken due to concerns about possible action by animal rights groups and other security issues.

    Simmons said that if the state won the case, the dogs would be euthanized, as called for under the county’s Animal Control Ordinance. He said this was based on the dogs being trained and used for fighting, which he said meant they were considered dangerous.

    Faron said in an interview that he’s willing to lose everything he owns if necessary to prevent euthanization of 127 dogs seized from his Wildside Kennels, which is beside his home.

    “I’ll probably end up having to file bankruptcy… as I fight to keep those dogs from dying,” he added.

    Faron said he became a victim of entrapment when two men who turned out to be working as part of the law enforcement investigation targeting him, came to his home and kennel on Mertie Road on Dec. 8 and bought two full-grown female pit bulls. He said one of the two men called about three weeks earlier asking about his dogs.

    Faron said the two men never said they wanted to use the two dogs themselves for fighting. They instead said they wanted to buy the two dogs “to work into their bloodlines,” which he said meant they wanted to breed them.

    He said the two men entrapped him on Dec. 8 by bringing up names of well known dog fighters and other things about dog fighting and drawing him into this conversation.

    Faron said he needed the money and started telling the men what he thought they wanted to hear. However, he said, when one of the two men asked him on Dec. 8 if either of the two dogs had been used for fighting, he said they had not been used for this.

    Arrested at the same time as Faron on Dec. 10 on one felony count each of dog fighting and baiting were Don Juan Casanova, 18, and Amanda Grace Lunsford, 25.

    Faron said that due to health problems affecting his handwriting, Casanova is authorized to sign paperwork involved with selling pit bulls from Wildside Kennels.

    He said Casanova, originally from Michigan, has lived near Wildside Kennels for over two years to help with the work involved with managing kennels. Casanova said he recently became sanctioned as a confirmation judge for pit bull dog shows by the All American Dog Registry LLC.

    Ms. Lunsford, originally from Taylorsville, said she has lived near there about a month and also helps with the kennel work. She said she was raised in a family involved with using pit bulls in the competitive sport of pulling weights, which is legal.

    Attorneys were appointed for Faron, Casanova and Ms. Lunsford in Wilkes District Court on Friday. All three have been released from custody under secured bonds of $2,500 each. If convicted, they could be sentenced to between four and 10 months in prison.

    Law enforcement officials said the investigation led them to believe Faron was one of the nation’s largest breeders of pit bulls used for fighting, but that authorities have no evidence indicating organized dog fighting occurred on or near the Wildside Kennels property.

    Wilkes Sheriff Dane Mastin said the charges were filed under a section of a state dog fighting statute that makes it illegal to possess or provide dogs for dog fighting. “Baiting” refers to harassing a tethered animal.

    Mastin said the charges culminated a three-year investigation involving his department, the Wilkes Animal Control Department and the Humane Society of the United States.
     
  2. bohawg00

    bohawg00 Big Dog

    If they can't afford to feed the dogs they shouldn't have taken them! They've already said the dogs were healthy. I hope the taxpayers of that county give them hell for wasting their money when they lose the case!
     
  3. KuttersKru

    KuttersKru Top Dog

    Good to know that they aren't dead yet
     
  4. c.knight

    c.knight Big Dog

    Why the hell would he have to pay if he is found not guilty couldnt he sue?
     
  5. SMOKIN HEMI

    SMOKIN HEMI CH Dog

    I think we are going to win this one folks. I just have a feeling..
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 17, 2008
  6. c.knight

    c.knight Big Dog

    Me to I think this might be the case we win
     
  7. dajuice

    dajuice Big Dog

    They are basicly trying to bankrupt the man. Do as much damage as they can while they can.
     
  8. All this is is another way to get more money, and help rid the man from everything he owns. This is bullshit to say the least. These people HAD NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER to take these dogs. They no cruelty proof and said they were all in great shape.
    If this had really been a 3 year investigation, they would have had the financial means and everything else already set up and in working order. This should have never been an issue. If I were Ed F. I would sue their asses for everything they have and stand for.
     
  9. pennsooner

    pennsooner CH Dog

    I find it VERY odd that this is all they have after 3 years.
     
  10. That would be because it was a lie. If Ed was really doing something wrong, and they been after him for 3years, then they would have charges piled up! But the fact is they do not.
     
  11. chinasmom

    chinasmom CH Dog

    Pure T Crap...I agree with what everyone else has said. They should have been prepared for the dogs. They should have had more charges. And the tax-payers should be on the court house steps everyday demanding an explanation of this careless and wreckless turn of events. 12,500. a month and this drags on and on. He will never see his way clear of all of it. Down right shame is what it is.
     
  12. jamonit

    jamonit Pup

    it is amazing how the "law" can come and take family members away and call you bad: but turn around and kill them saying they aren't fit to live with anyone. bs
     
  13. simms

    simms CH Dog

    Well it is the law and how it is written. If you support or have supported laws like this you have enabled these local governs and agencies .AR laws are bullshit, they will be the eradication of this breed.

    We're on the down side.
     
  14. DeadGame4

    DeadGame4 Big Dog

    Man some of you just dont get it. They didnt spend 3 years investigating him for a crimes and crimes and crimes. they spent 3 years figuring out how to make the charge stick, and bankrupt a top game dog breeder. Dont yo uget it? And they are doing it masterfully. I hjave a badn feeling about this one
     

Share This Page