Should the Game-Dog definition of Game/Gamess be updated?

we dont need to be philosophers or scientist to relate.

Agreed. But was it your intentions to relate or learn more about gameness? Mine was the later; i have enough friends.....

 

we dont need to 'display' our 'acquired' 'knowledge' through books read, or through the crudentials of others we reference.

We don't? I didn't know that you were in charge of setting parameters for this conversation. Acquired? as opposed to...........? Display? as opposed to.......?
Are you saying that you have never ref. someone or something on this board? On this thread:rolleyes: or the mayfield thread? OUCH......

 

now your catching on. Devils Advocate.

i am not in a position to define what gameness is or isnt (inexperienced). so i asked questions.


Tiger- the above quotes should have been sufficient to illustrate my "position". Reading comprehension is not your strong suit so i'll hold your hand through this conversation and explain to you that AC's response to questions about entropy and the ultimate fate of the universe in Asimov's "the last question" is: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER. After a "timeless interval" has elapsed, humanity's collective mind ask the AC to collect the necessary data. The AC responds: I WILL DO SO. I HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR A HUNDRED BILLION YEARS. MY PREDECESSORS HAVE BEEN ASKED THIS SAME QUESTION MANY TIMES. ALL THE DATA I HAVE REMAINS INSUFFICIENT. That is one smart computer By the way, the
AC does eventually come up with the answer, do you know what it is? Do yourself a favor and find out.........

 

junebug......thanks......ive learnt so much .......reference and display of a position....to relate my opinion......in any thread...an individual opinion based on my own understanding.
to relate it directly in response to a specific challenge to my own position,by specific posters.
im always happy to explore an opposing view , by relating with the opposing poster.
exploring the possibility in their position , and my own.using simple logic , and accountable facts.
i have stated my position,and if others wish to take me up directly on my opinion,im prepared to test and see...listen and learn....relate and understand.
im not interested in picking the bones out of any topic, or post, using specious arguments..from attacking the writing,spelling, or general style of other posters, were on a forum ,not at a lecture.we dont need to study the logic of the universe to conversate.........it was you ....yes..YOU.....who set perameters, not me.......YOU set this up as some kind of SCIENTIFIC debate....take your own advice.......go back ...reread....you will see who make claims...........and who asked questions...........
you will see who picked through every other posters view............you will see who made reference to how this thread should be conducted based on your favorite reading material......i asked you a specific question......im not interested in learning what GAMENESS is(do you really think you can teach me something my eyes havent already seen)....im interested in you giving me a straight opinion and view on your own understanding of it.....not going back to school thanks. not joining a book club.......not learning what you like to read......not pissing about the mulberry bush ,digging through the writings of others, to learn what your view is..............not learning to think like you.......not having to catch up with you by reading BS about the structure of scientific argument....not having to read crap like asimov......not having to day dream about mind numbing theoretical questions.....the topic is, 'should the game dog DEFINITION OF GAME/GAMENESS be updated'......i gave a definition ....im waiting for you to deconstruct it....brake it down.....show me its weakness........i will be very gratefull.
your first attempt was simply wrong.....please have another go....or give me your view
........you gave an example missing crucial bits of information to my relating to the example...i asked you a simply question,...........it requires a simple answer.... you went 'all around the houses'..with unimportant nonsense...but did not give a straight answer........remember.....the height of cultivation , runs to simplicity............
if you are unable to continue this conversation on topic....in relation to the thread....then go back to reading your inteligent books.and ignore this unread simpleton in his own ignorance......

 

Although i have read about it, i have never seen a dog jump the wall; I would imagine thats what it looks like on paper ^^^^^^^^.

 

thank you for the staight answer junebug...

 

Straight enough for you? Still waiting.......... I see why the mayfield thread was so long and ridiculous. Who is the constant in both of these threads?

 

My above quote should give you some insight into the inherent problem of defining gameness (or anything that is not only subjective but UNMEASURABLE). The moment you attempt to invoke human traits/characteristics to your definition........... How about a temporal component? same problem.......

 

ive already gave a definition......and pointed out your error.........go back reread and comprehend before proceeding.......

MAYFIELD THREAD.....i responded to the claims of PURITY......which were disproven where ?????
when???????
how???????
by who??????????
heres a clue...........they werent
and the sharing of posts ended amicably, with a general understanding
get it... got it.......... good

yes bright spark .....your not revealing some long lost understanding....we are aware of the problems with testing .....and you are correct that the end result can look the same......bravo........you have a grasp of comprehension........bully for you.....thanks for sharing...........the worlds now a smarter place.......youve elevated us mere mortals..LOL
THAT ................WAS ..............NEVER ...........IN ............DEBATE........

A QUESTION WAS ASKED .....a statement wasnt made..........your babbling drivel about your favorite mental masterbation devices in book form .....have lead you to pronounce.....what.............that you DONT KNOW SHIT...........YOUR NOT QAULIFIED TO DISCUSS SHIT..............YOU DONT NOW WHAT SHIT IS..........AND THAT ANY ONE ELSE DONT KNOW SHIT...........AND IT CANT BE MEASURED......LOL

HOW THE FUCK DOES A POMPOUS MORAN LIKE YOU SURVIVE IN THE REAL WORLD????????????????????????????????????????
ANSWER ...=....YOU DONT ....YOU BURY YOU HEAD IN BOOKS ...AND STROKE YOUR OWN EGO....THANKS JUNE BUG............BUT IVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOU ....AND YOUR WISDOM....YOUVE LEAD US ON A GRAND TOUR......ALL THE WAY TO NO WHERE...
IM NOT INTERESTED IN ANY MORE SHIT .YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT....OR ARE UNQUALIFIED TO DISCUSS................TOODLE OO

 

You know you "got" someone when they resort to yelling, insults and profanity.
Are you going back to waiting on your girlfriend to leave so you can look at porn? (your words not mine....ouch)

 

yelling...hillarious...but the rest of your post is correct.....shes a sleep..its 6:35am in the uk....ill be on the crack pipe ..and on the porn.lol...and later ill be relaxing on the blueberry.......remember junebug....theirs more to me than my perversions...LOL

 

OUCH...wtf.....theirs no OUCH, when i get high and watch porn....are you revealing something AC/JUNEBUG...LOL

 

"IM NOT INTERESTED IN ANY MORE SHIT .YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT" BAWHAHAHAHA spit my dip out after reading that :rant2: :scared: :dramacorn:

 

I know you enjoy this so here you go...if you look closely, you'll see a couple of "advanced, uncorrected readers proofs including Kaufman's "Investigations"! There is also The fourteenth Texas symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics and Mind Design II......

 

oh and junebug ....you are the constant ,in this thread the mayfield thread..........what was that eloquent discription of you by another poster IN THE MAYFIELD THREAD........errrrrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmmm......... i think it started with FAG.....LOL:neener:

 

:any more in the library junebug ....i bet your fascinating: ANY GAME DOG BOOKS???

 

Nope. Don't know much about gamedogs (i think i have said that a few times:rolleyes What is fascinating is the fact that you, who most people on here including myself would agree, know a lot about gamedogs but is having a difficult time keeping up. More fascinating is the fact that you chose to scratch into little ol' me (dont know much remember). Do you normally scratch into the weakest comp? We call that getting yourself into a pickle...........

 

junebug...your funny.......i dont know shit
i was hoping you would lead me to game dog understanding.....but you proved to be a false messiah...
now back to your library .....what about your 70s porn collection...lol

 

lol.......i think you will find you reacted to one of my posts junebug.....it wasnt the other way round...dont get it twisted.......this is a forum ....where we share posts.............are we scratching??..LOL......its all fun junebug.....all fun

 

i think you will find you reacted to one of my posts junebug.....it wasnt the other way round...dont get it twisted.

Sigh: Post #22:o. Watching a train wreck is my perversion......